Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Henrik Karlsson's avatar

These are fascinating thoughts.

Re: ChatGPT. I'm unimpressed by the quality of the output, and worried about the flood of content coming. Maggie Appleton had a great piece about it recently: https://maggieappleton.com/ai-dark-forest and Lars Doucet: https://www.fortressofdoors.com/ai-markets-for-lemons-and-the-great-logging-off/ So we're getting a lot more noise and weak content, but ... no tools that help high end writers write better yet. It is clear to me that none of the companies in the space have a deep understanding for what writing is, the process of it, and what a writer would want automated. I think there are great opportunities to help writers, if you have an understanding of their process etc. But I haven't seen any serious attempts yet.

Interestingly, the ChatGPT point also ties in with the first point: curating small communities will likely become more important going forward, as a way to ensure quality and trust. So there will be a strong incentive to develop tooling on this side. I don't know what it will look like really, but I'm not convinced Substack is trending in the right direction to fit this niche. I think what you want are ways to allow legitemate peripheral participation - ways for ppl to mature into a community, and gradually and fluidly get more access. Oh, I'm rambling and have no time to edit this!

Have a lovely day

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts